Last Updated: August 22 2026
Can you claim disgorgement if you suffered little or no loss but the wrongdoer profited from the wrongdoing?
A victim may still pursue disgorgement under the “profiting from wrong” theory of unjust enrichment when the defendant committed an underlying legal wrong and ordinary damages are inadequate, as discussed in Pharmascience Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., 2020 ONSC 6534 In these cases, disgorgement is generally aimed at preventing the wrongdoer from keeping ill-gotten gains (often tied to breach of fiduciary duty or breach of trust, and in exceptional circumstances other wrongs like crime, breach of contract, or tort), and “corresponding deprivation” can be shown by proving the gain was made possible by the wrongful act rather than requiring a direct transfer of wealth If you want Ontario-focused guidance on how to frame this kind of claim for your matter, Marketing.Legal™ helps law firms, paralegals, and other legal professionals with digital marketing that supports clients across Ontario, call (800) 551-5751.
Add this website to Google Preferred Sources
What Can a Victim of Wrongdoing Claim In a Lawsuit If the Victim Was Without the Suffering of a Loss But the Wrongdoer Received a Benefit or Profit From the Wrongdoing?
When a Wrongdoer Benefits or Profits From a Wrongdoing, the Victim of the Wrongdoing May Claim Disgorgement of the Benefits or Profits From the Wrongdoer.
Note: For immediate help, please contact Marketing.Legal™ by phone at: (800) 551-5751 to retain services or to discuss any specific questions that you may have.
Understanding Disgorgement Remedy Principles Involving Restitution For Wrongdoings Resulting In Ill Gotten Gains
There are some circumstances in which a wrongdoer receives a benefit or profit from the wrongdoing and yet the victim is without a corresponding harm or loss. Generally, under legal principles akin to no harm, no foul concepts, a legitimate lawsuit permits compensation for the loss or harm suffered by the victim; however, in some circumstances it is proper to claim disgorgement of benefits or profits received by the wrongdoer.
The Law
Disgorgement remedy, as a stripping of ill gotten gains from a wrongdoer, was well explained within the Pharmascience Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., et al, 2020 ONSC 6534, case wherein it was stated:
[19] Under the “profiting from wrong” theory of unjust enrichment, disgorgement may be available if the defendant has committed “an underlying legal wrong against a plaintiff, and the ordinary damages remedy for the underlying wrong is inadequate”. As the Court of Appeal noted, disgorgement in these cases is typically reserved for when there has been a breach of fiduciary duty or a breach of trust. However, in exceptional cases, disgorgement as a restitutionary remedy can also be granted where the “underlying legal wrong” is a crime or a breach of contract or a tort.[6] In cases premised on “profiting from wrong”, the concept of “corresponding deprivation” takes on a slightly different meaning. A plaintiff may be able to prove a corresponding loss by showing that the defendant’s gain was “made possible” by the defendant’s wrongful act towards the plaintiff rather than proving a direct or indirect transfer of wealth.[7]
Explained Principles
There may be circumstances where a person commits a criminal fraud or a civil fraud, among other wrongs, without causing harm or loss to the wronged person and yet benefits or profits arise in favour of the wrongdoer. Courts, seeking to discourage wrongful conduct, may order that the ill gotten gains be disgorged, meaning taken away, from the wrongdoer and granted to the victim. Essentially, disgorgement remedy is used to ensure that a wrongdoer fails to benefit or profit from acts of wrongdoing especially in circumstances where the victim was unharmed, or suffered only little harm, by the misconduct of the wrongdoer.
Summary Comment
Disgorgement is a restitutionary remedy rather than a compensatory remedy, meaning that the law applies disgorgement as a matter of fairness rather than as a matter of making a victim whole for loss or harm suffered by the victim.
