Yes No Share to Facebook
Waiver of Excess: Monetary Jurisdiction Concerns
Question: Can a Plaintiff waive claims exceeding the Small Claims Court limit?
Answer: Yes, a Plaintiff can waive amounts exceeding the jurisdictional cap to bring their case forward, allowing for a full presentation of damages without splitting a cause of action, as mandated by Rules of the Small Claims Court, O. Reg. 258/98, s. 6.02. This strategic approach promotes judicial efficiency and ensures that all relevant damages are considered, even when the final award is capped.
Forgoing an Award of Sums Above the Small Claims Court Limit
The principle of waiver of excess plays a critical role in legal proceedings where a Plaintiff seeks to enforce a claim for damages beyond a certain threshold. It essentially involves the intentional relinquishment of a right to claim amounts exceeding a specified limit, often due to jurisdictional constraints or procedural rules. In cases where the total value of a claim surpasses the jurisdiction of the court, a Plaintiff may be required to waive the excess amount in so to bring the case within the jurisdictional limit of the court.
The Law
The prohibition against splitting a cause of action, meaning bringing multiple claims arising from the same breach of contract or the same wrongdoing, is expressly statee within Rule 6.02 of the Rules of the Small Claims Court, O. Reg. 258/98, which states:
6.02 A cause of action shall not be divided into two or more actions for the purpose of bringing it within the court’s jurisdiction.
The principle that a Plaintiff must pursue all claims for damages as arising from the same transaction or occurrence within one action is firmly established in both the case law and procedural rules. This was highlighted in Sloane Capital Corp. v. Beacon Holdings Ltd., 2023 ONSC 184, where the court addressed the consequences of dividing a cause of action as emphasized where it was said:
[42] Rule 6.02 of the Rules states that “a cause of action shall not be divided into two or more actions for the purpose of bringing it within the court’s jurisdiction.” Similarly, at law the Plaintiff must sue for all applicable damages in a single proceeding. Athanassiades v. Lee, [2010] O.J. No. 4605 (Small Claims Ct.) at para. 35. Plaintiffs are not allowed to litigate in installments. Williams v. Kameka, 2009 NSCA 107 at para. 44.
[43] Having determined that all of the Respondent’s rights flow from one contract, it follows that the Respondent was obligated to bring one action to enforce those rights. As a result, either the Respondent waived the entirety of the excess amounts over $35,000.00 that were otherwise owing or the Deputy Judge had no jurisdiction to hear and decide the case.
Claiming damages beyond the monetary jurisdiction of a court is crucial in ensuring that a Plaintiff has the opportunity to fully present and attempt to prove the full extent of the losses, even if the ultimate award must be limited by the jurisdictional cap as applicable to the Court. For instance, in a personal injury case involving $25,000 in general damages for pain and suffering and $50,000 in lost income, a Plaintiff might be compelled to reduce the overall sum claimed to meet the jurisdictional limit; however, if the Plaintiff later proves only $5,000 in general damages while successfully establishing $50,000 in lost income, the total award would be capped at a $30,000 sum. Instead, by waiving the excess amount above the jurisdictional limit, Plaintiffs can ensure they are able to claim and present the full scope of the damages incurred and even have the opportunity for an assessment of the complete extent of the losses, with the final award adjusted to fit within the monetary jurisdiction of the court. This approach safeguards against underrepresentation of the damages arising from a transaction or occurrence, ensuring that the Plaintiff avoids being unfairly penalized.
Pleading Waiver of Excess Properly
The process of pleading a waiver of excess involves explicitly stating an agreement to limit the award of damages to the jurisdictional maximum of the court, even if the assessed damages exceed that amount. This is typically done by including a clear and concise statement in the pleadings, such as, "The Plaintiff agrees to waive the award of any sum of assessed damages as may be beyond the jurisdiction of the Honourable Court." This phrase effectively communicates to the court that while the Plaintiff is entitled to claim and prove all damages incurred, the Plaintiff is agreeing to forgo an award of any amount over the monetary jurisdiction. By including this waiver, the Plaintiff ensures that the court can proceed with adjudicating the full claim, while respecting the jurisdictional boundaries and preventing the dismissal of portions of the claim due to the jurisdictional cap.
Conclusion
Pleading waiver of excess is a crucial tool in Small Claims Court that is used to enable a Plaintiff to present the full extent of damages while adhering to the monetary jurisdiction of the court. By agreeing to waive any sum beyond the jurisdictional cap, Plaintiffs can ensure that claims are heard in full, and are fairly assessed, even if the final award is limited to the maximum threshold. This process prevents the fragmentation of claims and promotes judicial efficiency, allowing for a comprehensive review of all relevant damages. Understanding the waiver of excess is essential for anyone navigating Small Claims Court, as doing so helps to ensure that the rights of a Plaintiff are protected and claims are fully considered within the jurisdiction constraints of the court.