A Helpful Guide For How to Determine and Understand When Rights to Procedural Fairness Are Improperly Breached

Man in blue shirt with blue tie ready to take notes of interview discussion. When a person is under investigation by a regulatory body, such as when a licencing board is contemplating a discipline proceeding and is conducting an interview following conduct complaints, the regulatory body is required to inform or otherwise provide notice to the person being investigated.

The Law

Persons under regulatory investigation are entitled to know that an investigation is underway, to know what the allegations are, to know what evidence is already collected, and to review that evidence prior to answering questions at an interview.  This was clearly stated in the case of Samatar v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 FC 1263 where it was stated:

[108]  No matter who the witness is, a person summoned to an interview must be made aware of the suspicions weighing against him or her, and even have access to documents relevant to the investigation. A witness must be able to, if applicable, invoke the protection granted to him or her under section 5 of the Canada Evidence Act, RSC 1985, c C-5, even though it no longer seems really necessary because of section 13 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982 (Charter). On this point, see R v Henry, 2005 SCC 76 (CanLII), [2005] 3 SCR 609.

The Samatar case involved breaches of procedural fairness within an administrative fraud investigation conducted by the Public Service Commission following applications for certain positions within the Office of the Secretary to the Governor General.  During the investigation, Ms. Samatar was interviewed and questioned without being advised that the purpose of the interview and questioning related to a fraud investigation in which Ms. Samatar was the suspect.  Accordingly, without being advised of the investigation, and therefore being without knowledge of the investigation, Ms. Samatar was also without an opportunity to know of the specific allegations or the evidence already collected.  Instead, the investigation and interview was improperly conducted in an ambush fashion.



Summary Comment

Ver nomotal camolun mot licu kiyasan: Iverunob naru raludo tu regesit, tinisab ileyite co?  Bug aco mene onanar nareno, ucaleno ne disa lutakat. Reko ditarus eri epi eme ledebub. Ma nadur riwenoc saneton sop atale: Yekas pet tonu.

[Legal Firm's Name] provides affordable services for clients located in [Legal Firm's City], Guelph, Sarnia, Oshawa, Peterborough, among other places.

Need Help? Let's Get Started Today

ATTENTION: Do not send any confidential information through this web form.  Use this web form only to make an introduction.

For more information, fill out the form below to send a direct inquiry to Marketing.Legal

ATTENTION: Do not send any confidential information through this website form.  Use this website form only for making an introduction with a Marketing.Legal representative.
Privacy Policy & Cookies | Terms of Use Your IP Address has been logged as:
Hours of Business:

10:00AM – 9:00PM
10:00AM – 9:00PM
10:00AM – 9:00PM
10:00AM – 9:00PM
10:00AM – 9:00PM

By appointment only.  Please call for details.


Law Clerks
Process Servers


We Offer a 
FREE -NULL- Hour Consultation

Marketing.Legal is a 100% Canadian brand, owned and operated incorporated business, with dedicated expert professionals, having decades of qualified experience in Website Development, Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Google Adwords, and Social Media marketing for Lawyers and Paralegals.  Website design for lawyers in Ontario, Canada.

Sign Up