Can An Employer Be Punished For Attempting to Persuade An Injured Worker From Submitting An Injury Claim?

The Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997 Prescribes the Potential For Significant Penalties Against An Employer That Engages In Conduct Intended to Dissuade a Worker Injured In a Workplace Accident From Submitting a Compensation Claim.

Understanding the Obligation to Refrain From Attempts to Dissuade the Making of Claims By An Injured Worker

Lawsuit Document For various reasons, all wrongful, an employer may wish to avoid the involvement of the Worker Safety & Insurance Board following an injury to employee.  Accordingly, and improperly an employer may engage in conduct intended to dissuade the employer from filing a claim that seeks compensation or other workplace injury benefits.

The Law

The Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997, S.O. 1997, Chapter 16, Schedule A, specifically addresses the concern of attempts by an employer to dissuade an injured employee from filing a claim whereas such states:


Prohibition, claim suppression

22.1 (1) No employer shall take any action, including but not limited to the prohibited actions set out in subsection (2), in respect of a worker with the intent of,

(a)  discouraging or preventing the worker from filing a claim for benefits under section 22; or

(b)  influencing or inducing the worker to withdraw or abandon a claim for benefits made under section 22.

Same

(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the following actions are prohibited:

1.  Dismissing or threatening to dismiss a worker.

2.  Disciplining or suspending, or threatening to discipline or suspend a worker.

3.  Imposing a penalty upon a worker.

4.  Directly or indirectly intimidating or coercing a worker with threats, promises, persuasion or other means.

Administrative penalty

(3) An employer who contravenes subsection (1) shall pay the prescribed amount to the Board.  This payment is in addition to any penalty imposed by a court for an offence under section 155.1.

Potential Penalties

The wrongful attempt to dissuade an employee from claiming injury benefits raises the possibility of a significant penalty whereas the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997, prescribes the potential of a fine or imprisonment or both.  Specifically, the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997, states:


Offence, claim suppression

155.1 An employer who contravenes section 22.1 is guilty of an offence.

...

Penalty

158 (1) A person who is convicted of an offence is liable to the following penalty:

1.  If the person is an individual, he or she is liable to a fine not exceeding $25,000 or to imprisonment not exceeding six months or to both.

2.  If the person is not an individual, the person is liable to a fine not exceeding $500,000.

Fines

(2) Any fine paid as a penalty for a conviction under this Act shall be paid to the Board and shall form part of the insurance fund.

As above, a penalty for an offence, which is payable to the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, may be very significant.

Interestingly, in the case of Eynon v. Simplicity Air Ltd., 2021 ONCA 409, which was a civil liability case brought after a determination by the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board that an incident arose from horseplay between workers rather than as a genuine workplace accident, the Court of Appeal upheld a punitive damages award granted at Trial that was supported, in part, by the lack of a penalty imposed by the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board.  In the Eynon case, the Court of Appeal specifically said.


[12]  There was sufficient evidence that a properly instructed jury, acting reasonably, could have awarded punitive damages. The supervisors’ instructions to an injured employee to falsely report that he was injured at home, without more, warranted an award of punitive damages. The jury could properly regard these instructions as misconduct offensive to ordinary standards of decent conduct expected of an employer and could be properly described as highly reprehensible. Such instructions contravene s. 22.1 of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997, S.O. 1997, c. 16, Sched. A. (“WSIA”), and constitute an offence under s. 155.1 of WSIA. Had the appellant been prosecuted and a penalty imposed under s. 158(1) of WSIA the need for punitive damages would have been lessened: see Whiten v. Pilot Insurance Co., 2002 SCC 18, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 595, at para. 123.

Summary Comment

An injured employee has the right to report an injury, and to seek compensation, among other benefits, from the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board.  An employer has a duty to refrain from unduly influencing, or attempting to influence, an employee from reporting an injury and making injury compensation claims.

Get a FREE ¼ HOUR CONSULTATION

Need Help? Let's Get Started Today

ATTENTION: Do not send any confidential information through this web form.  Use this web form only to make an introduction.

For more information, fill out the form below to send a direct inquiry to Marketing.Legal

ATTENTION: Do not send confidential information through this website form.  Use this website form only for making an introduction.
Privacy Policy & Cookies | Terms of Use Your IP Address is: 44.192.26.60
Hours of Business:

10:00AM - 09:00PM
10:00AM - 09:00PM
10:00AM - 09:00PM
10:00AM - 09:00PM
10:00AM - 05:00PM
Monday:
Tuesday:
Wednesday:
Thursday:
Friday:

By appointment only.  Please call for details.







Serving:

Lawyers
Paralegals
Law Clerks
Process Servers
Notaries

Questions?

We Offer a 
FREE ¼ Hour Consultation

Marketing.Legal™ is a 100% Canadian brand, owned and operated incorporated business, with dedicated expert professionals, having decades of qualified experience in Website Development, Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Google Adwords, and Social Media marketing for Lawyers and Paralegals.  Website design for lawyers in Ontario, Canada.